Supervisors unable to reach consensus on cannabis project • Atascadero News


Diablo decommissioning project presented with updates

SAN LUIS OBISPO – The San Luis Obispo County Supervisory Board met on Tuesday, November 2 for a regular meeting at 9 a.m.

The meeting opened with a discussion around item 18 of the consent agenda: the request for approval of a contract for the 2021-22 fiscal year with Soundheal Inc in an amount not exceeding 175,320 $ to test the effectiveness of sound meditation in improving mental health outcomes. Two community members objected at this point, prompting Supervisor John Peschong to bring forward a motion to bring the topic back to an upcoming meeting for further discussion. It was reported that funds had already been approved for “alternative methods” and that these methods had been tested and proven in mental health scenarios for over fifty years. Supervisor Bruce Gibson suggested not withholding the item for future discussion and approving funds immediately to ensure implementation could begin as soon as possible, but the motion to bring it back for a presentation during a next meeting was approved.

Following the consent agenda, a resolution was heard recognizing Nov. 7-13 as Retired Teachers’ Week in San Luis Obispo County, followed by a resolution commemorating JoAnn Switzer on the occasion. of his retirement from the Cattlemen’s Association.

Go through this together, Atascadero

An update to the Diablo Canyon Power Plant decommissioning project has been completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The presentation showed areas that would have buildings removed, as well as buildings that would remain or be constructed. A land scan would be done to analyze the soil to see if radiation exists and would be handled and processed.

The final point of the day was a hearing to consider an appeal of the refusal of the planning commission of a cannabis project located in Pozo. Supervisor Dawn Ortiz-Legg was on the Planning Commission at the time and voted against the project and said she approached the project with the data and information available at the time and made a conclusion based on unbiased facts and that she plans to do it again today with her role as supervisor.

The project aims to establish cannabis-related activities including three acres of outdoor cultivation, 22,000 square feet of indoor cultivation, 16,000 square feet of auxiliary nursery, 9,500 square feet of auxiliary processing and a modification of the parking lot to reduce the required parking spaces from 80 to 26. The project falls under the category of agricultural land use in Pozo.

The caller, Michael Aniff of Pegaso, Inc., expressed his gratitude to the neighbors who were willing to discuss the project and their concerns with him, and he did his best to alleviate those concerns. In addition, if the project is approved, he plans to live there, full time to be available to neighbors, manage the project and oversee the operation. He had been informed that previously alfalfa, a product that requires a large amount of water, had been grown on the property and that the well was capable of producing sufficient water. There was a discussion about the validity of the information provided to him, but the water use planned for the project only intends to use 4 acre-feet of water, which is less to the normal allowance.

Many neighbors spoke out against the project, saying the area was not intended for industrial operations and that traffic, noise and odors would ruin the quality of life the area has to offer. The issue of water use has been raised and fears that adding agriculture to the region will be devastating under the already dry conditions.

Supervisor Ortiz-Legg spoke about the matter, indicating that this project is being overseen by someone interested in supporting the community and being a productive member of it, which is better than many operations that could occur if the land was put into operation. sale after rejection of the project.

Supervisor Bruce Gibson highlighted the enforcement plans that exist to ensure cannabis-related projects are monitored and noise or odor violations are addressed. President Lynn Compton refuted that odor nuisance is a very subjective element and that many people can be bothered by smells and not be able to find a remedy.

The motion to uphold the appeal was introduced by Supervisor Gibson and was not passed with a 2-2 vote, with Chairman Compton and Supervisor Peschong in opposition. A motion to dismiss the appeal also failed with a 2-2 vote. The county council said that in this case, the decision of the planning commissions would be upheld if the board decides that further deliberations will not produce a positive vote. It was decided that the Council would not be able to reach an agreement and the meeting was adjourned.

The agenda for the next Supervisors Meeting will be posted on the County website when it is available at

Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.